![]() ALSO - the fact that the XT3/4 APSC bodys are almost always compared to FF cameras should tell you how great they are as well.Īt least it tell how large they are, Fuji APS-C cameras are the size of FF cameras. ![]() The fact that the A7iii is still being mentioned is proof to how great it is - but how great it is also gives Fuji and others a nice target to shoot for. I also don't think this should be a surprise as the A7iii is a month or so shy of being 3 years old. I think the Xt4 will BARELY edge out the A7III but it certainly won't be a slaughter, and will come down to shooting experience. Those subset of people will always choose the FF cam over a comparable APSC body and their comments tend to lean towards validating their FF body rather than to truly compare the 2. I think when it's all said and done and more people get their hands on it, the Fuji will be preferred all things told except for the people that swear by FF. Is there any other APSC camera you'd pit against the A7iii in a faceoff? It can't be many APSC cameras out there that want to meet an A7iii in a dark alley. ALSO - the fact that the XT3/4 APSC bodys are almost always compared to FF cameras should tell you how great they are as well. It’s better to use one to understand the potential. It’s not that one is truly the better camera, but Fuji is a very unique system designed to deliver stunning, sometimes mind blowing image quality right out of the gate while also providing a very connected experience for the photographer. As much as I admire Sony if I had to pick one it would be Fuji. Fuji controls your either love or hate, the battery life is surprisingly decent and the focusing is impressive, but it’s not a sports camera by any measure. I find some of Fuji’s primes very reminiscent of my Leica days. The 35 F2 and 50 F2 are perfect examples of this: Tiny, crisp, rich color and contrast and smooth bokeh with weather sealing and blistering fast silent auto focus. ![]() Fuji lenses are also an enigma, more often then not punching way above their weight class. I think Fuji’s colors and tones are simply lovely and when I don’t feel like processing the Fuji JPEGs are ready for production. The Fuji really hits higher than it should, often matching my FF bodies. You know it’s apples and oranges and then not so much. ![]() there are SO many cameras to appeal to many One is staying with the Canon and Canon looks to have an amazing new camera. I have another friend who went from a D850 to the Z6. He is a DSLR user and I would agree the DSLR has its place still BUT in some cased mirrorless even Nikon Z works great. One of my pro photographer friends has said Fuji X is a fun camera to play with for the hobby not for work. I cant speak enough on the video side of things to pick it apart but then I would bring the Panasonic in to the comparison GH5 or SH, full frame camera. If you have a speciality can the given camera system do what you need. Keep in mind ANY camera can be a great A+ landscape camera. Then look at lenses and accessories to include flash system, to me that is a factor to look for. Look at it like this the Sony A7 iii and Fuji XT-4 are like $100 in cost apart. I never say never, but for now I cant see myself going backwards to a smaller sensor with APS-C I did have to switch from Fuji X to Nikon since I was not confident in the Sony A7 ii (2) at the time of my decision. I was confident the A7 iii could replace the Nikon D850 and I did not need F 2.8 zooms to do it or I never would have switched to Sony. Maybe it is has changed who knows with the XT-4. My requirement is snappy auto focus with lock on, maybe Fuji has gotten better, but for event photography Fuji X can not keep up with a DSLR or what I get out of Sony. Muy experience with Fuji has been fine overall.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |